Skip to content

Conversation

frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor

@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja commented Aug 15, 2025

Currently the comment mistakenly refer to [optional.iterators], while [optional.ref.iterators] should be referred to instead.

Fixes #8155.

Copy link
Member

@jwakely jwakely left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There's a typo in the commit message (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muphry%27s_law) otherwise ok

…ors]

Currently the comment mistakenly refer to [optional.iterators], while [optional.ref.iterators] should be referred to instead.
@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja force-pushed the ref-option-ref-iterators branch from f61302b to a58de3c Compare August 15, 2025 10:53
@frederick-vs-ja
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jwakely Should have fixed it.

@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Aug 15, 2025

Thanks!

@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit 51a5bba into cplusplus:main Aug 15, 2025
2 checks passed
@frederick-vs-ja frederick-vs-ja deleted the ref-option-ref-iterators branch August 15, 2025 11:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[optional.optional.ref.general] Link for "iterator support" is incorrect
3 participants